The Supreme Court turned away two appeals asking the justices to overrule a 25-year-old decision that allowed for buffer ...

The Supreme Court declined to consider overturning a 24-year-old precedent that upheld "buffer zone" laws limiting how close ...

At issue was a 25-year precedent that allows local governments to create protest-free buffer zones around all health-care ...

Abortion opponents wanted the Supreme Court to scrap protest restrictions around clinics. Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito ...

The U.S. Supreme Court declined Monday to hear a challenge to the legality of buffer zones used to protect access to abortion ...

The Supreme Court has declined to hear cases from abortion opponents who say limiting demonstrations near clinics violate ...

Justices Thomas and Alito dissented from the court’s refusal to reconsider a 25-year-old precedent upholding “buffer zones” ...

For nearly three years, it has seemed inevitable that the Supreme Court would strike down the “buffer zones” that restrict ...

The cities argued that the restrictions were enacted to curb disturbing behavior from protesters outside health care facilities.

On Monday, the Supreme Court handed abortion rights advocates a rare win when they declined to take up a pair of cases ...

Thomas, an appointee of former President George H.W. Bush, criticized the Supreme Court’s refusal to revisit Hill v. Colorado (2000), a precedent that upheld so-called free speech “buffer zones” ...

Supreme Court rejects anti-abortion group challenge to buffer zones, which Thomas called an ‘abdication’ of their duty ...