The Supreme Court Ducked Another Big Abortion Case. Clarence Thomas Is Livid.
For nearly three years, it has seemed inevitable that the Supreme Court would strike down the “buffer zones” that restrict protests near the entrances of reproductive health clinics. A majority of the court has already castigated these laws—and past precedent upholding them—as a subversion of anti-abortion protesters’ First Amendment rights.
The court decided not to take the case brought against the government by an Air National Guard member who was paralyzed ...
The Root on MSN1d
Oh Lord, Republicans are Pushing for a Clarence Thomas Statue, But Here’s Why This Should Never HappenAs Republicans are enjoying their majority in both the House and Senate, they are also pushing forth their own (questionable) ...
The court rarely sides with death row inmates, so this rebuke to dishonest prosecutors is a remarkable victory in the fight ...
The US Supreme Court has once again refused to overturn an oft-criticized rule that bars soldiers from suing the federal ...
Democrats have long opposed honoring Thomas, a Georgia native who was accused of sexual harassment during his 1991 confirmation hearing.
The Supreme Court bucked its lengthy streak of letting questionable executions move forward and threw out the infamous death ...
The U.S. Supreme Court avoided deadlock with a fractured 5-3 decision to give Richard Glossip, the Oklahoma death row inmate ...
SCOTUS vacated the death sentence of an Oklahoma man named Richard Glossip. But we should take a closer look at the dissent by Justice Clarence Thomas.
Results that may be inaccessible to you are currently showing.
Hide inaccessible results
Feedback